It is a morally neutral act which may be rendered good or evil by intention and circumstances. In this scenario, the object is indifferent, as the taking of a human life is not necessarily predicated to good or evil. 357 into the intruder’s solar plexus, killing him instantly. Before he can aim the weapon, Albert discharges three rounds from his. 22 pistol and turns around to shoot him, but his reflexes are too slow.
Ernest, not seeing that Albert has a gun, pulls out his. Albert commands Ernest to stand up and put his hands in the air. Ernest Latronus is in the process of stealing various articles of value from the family safe, which he has successfully opened. Vigilantius is still sleeping, he walks down the hall, past his children’s rooms and goes down the stairs to where he heard the noise. 357 magnum revolver, which he keeps concealed in the top of his closet. Albert takes the precaution of taking out his. He knows this could be a dangerous situation for him and his family, as last week, there was a robbery / murder at the Innocens family home down the street. Second scenario, self defense: Albert Vigilantius is in his home asleep. Finally, the following circumstances are bad: (who) the man shot was an innocent individual seeking to protect his home (what) Albert was killing to conceal a crime (where) Albert was in the home of someone else, trespassing on his property (how) his presence in the home was by an illegal (and immoral) forced entry (by what means) a stolen firearm was used. The intention was also bad, as the motive for the killing was not the protection of some good, but the preventing justice by covering another crime, robbery. In this scenario, the object, killing an innocent man, is bad. When Ernest threatens to call the police and moves to the telephone, Albert shoots him. Albert is surprised by Ernest and pulls his gun.
#IS A 19 ON THE ACT GOOD CRACK#
While in the family den, trying to crack the safe, he is happened upon by Ernest, who was awaken by the noise of the forced entry and wanted to protect his household. 45 caliber pistol and his intention is to steal the Innocens family jewels. įirst scenario, murder: Albert Malefactor breaks into the home of Ernest Innocens in the middle of the night. A defect in any of these renders the act morally evil. At least one of these must be good others may be indifferent and none may be evil. The goodness of a moral act is determined by three elements: object, intention, and circumstances. Explain how this sort of analysis differs from situation ethics.”
Describe three different imaginary situations based on intentions and circumstances (who, what, where, when, by what means, how) that make it (1) murder, (2) self-defense, (3) heroism. Here was the assignment: “Albert kills Ernest.
I was instructed to explain them in terms of three scenarios. The three parts of a moral act: object, intention, and circumstances.